A Quality-Control Layer Before Your Plans Ever Reach a Reviewer
Catch what's fixable now, not after a comment letter.
A repeat correction cycle rarely comes from a design decision — it usually comes from something that could have been caught before submission: a missing signature, an inconsistency between disciplines, a document that didn't match the jurisdiction's current requirements.
permitOS™ gives architects and engineers a pre-submission review layer — powered by PREiQ™ — along with comment-response tracking and revision coordination, so fewer of those avoidable issues make it into a review cycle at all.
Repeat corrections are expensive, and often avoidable.
Design teams lose real time to:
- –Issues that only surface after a reviewer flags them
- –Inconsistencies between architectural, structural, and MEP documents
- –Missing or incorrect digital signatures and seals
- –Requirements that differ from what the last jurisdiction expected
- –Comment-response tracking spread across email and marked-up PDFs
- –Revision coordination that's hard to keep straight across a project team
Every one of these is a delay that had nothing to do with the actual design.
Catch it before a reviewer does.
Pre-Submission Document Review
Run a package through review before it goes to the jurisdiction, while there's still time to fix what's found.
PREiQ™ Findings
Get flagged issues organized and categorized, instead of discovering them one at a time from a reviewer's comment letter.
Comment-Response Tracking
Track reviewer comments and your team's responses in one organized record, not scattered across email threads.
Revision Coordination
Keep the design team aligned on what changed, what still needs to change, and who owns each revision.
Digital Signature Checks
Catch missing or incorrect digital signatures and seals before they hold up a submission.
Cross-Discipline Consistency
Surface inconsistencies between architectural, structural, and MEP documents before a reviewer does.
Jurisdiction-Specific Requirements
Work against the current requirements for the jurisdiction you're submitting to, not last year's checklist.
Reduced Repeat Corrections
Fewer avoidable issues reaching review means fewer resubmittal cycles on the same category of problem.
A quality-control and coordination tool, not a replacement for professional judgment.
permitOS and PREiQ™ don't replace your professional judgment, your licensure, or your firm's responsibility for the work. They're designed to flag likely issues and organize the review and revision process — the design decisions, the technical judgment, and the signed and sealed documents remain entirely your firm's.
The goal is fewer avoidable correction cycles, not a different design process.
Common questions from architects and engineers.
Does PREiQ replace my firm's own QA/QC process?
No. It's designed to complement your firm's existing quality-control process, not replace it — catching common, flaggable issues doesn't substitute for your professional review and judgment.
Does this mean permitOS is reviewing our work for code compliance?
No. permitOS flags likely issues based on document completeness and consistency — it doesn't make code-compliance determinations, and it doesn't replace your firm's professional responsibility for the design.
Can multiple firms on the same project use this together?
Yes — permitOS is built around a shared project record, so architects, engineers, and other project team members can coordinate from the same information.
Which Florida jurisdictions does this cover today?
permitOS is in active development across Orange County (Unincorporated), the City of Orlando, and Seminole County (Unincorporated), with additional Florida jurisdictions being added. See our Jurisdictions page for current coverage.